Forum Master
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
5,246
Feedback:
Points:
43,401
Location:
NJ/NYC
Months ago | 7th February 2012 21:04
Get a pic of the size tag
Frequent Visitor
Joined:
Jan 2009
Posts:
306
Feedback:
Points:
51,873
Location:
La Mirada, CA
Months ago | 10th February 2012 20:27
These are fake, 100% sure. Fakes are getting good at the cement print.. Knew the shape was off at first, but tag confirms it. The copyright C is off, should be in a different font, with the top and bottom of the C very close to the circle, as well as the date, should be touching (in some case veryveryvery closely touching) the barcode,
lawls.
Forum Master
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
5,246
Feedback:
Points:
43,401
Location:
NJ/NYC
Months ago | 11th February 2012 15:17
Justinnn:
These are fake, 100% sure. Fakes are getting good at the cement print.. Knew the shape was off at first, but tag confirms it. The copyright C is off, should be in a different font, with the top and bottom of the C very close to the circle, as well as the date, should be touching (in some case veryveryvery closely touching) the barcode,
Get a pic of the size tag
These are fake, 100% sure. Fakes are getting good at the cement print.. Knew the shape was off at first, but tag confirms it. The copyright C is off, should be in a different font, with the top and bottom of the C very close to the circle, as well as the date, should be touching (in some case veryveryvery closely touching) the barcode,
[quote="Justinnn"]These are fake, 100% sure. Fakes are getting good at the cement print.. Knew the shape was off at first, but tag confirms it. The copyright C is off, should be in a different font, with the top and bottom of the C very close to the circle, as well as the date, should be touching (in some case veryveryvery closely touching) the barcode,[/quote]