Forum Master
Joined:
Sep 2005
Posts:
4,694
Feedback:
Points:
0
Location:
1060 W. Addison
Months ago | 21st July 2008 07:15
anyone has comparison pics of bred I's? 94 and 01? I keep telling my friend that the 01 bred are little lower than the 94s. I could be wrong.
congrats to Obama. Historic day. Historic President. Historic term. History was made.
Illinois-Land of Obama
Sydni Yoshie Rounds 1990-2008 RIP
from mj234eva:[quote:f18f86c16f]ISS members(a large # who are active) for the last couple years don't or can't read...this is evident when you are selling something and get asked constantly the same ?s clearly answered already in your thread. In regards to them acting like lil kids, they aren't acting...this place is full of early to mid 90s babies. Sadly they have ruined what ISS use to be. ISS' family like atmosphere is long gone.[/quote:f18f86c16f]
imo the ogs looks better with the nike air logo and that i really hate the jumpman logo they have on it
very helpful thanx mod
I don't like how in the CDP Black cement they made the cement print part, "thinner?" It's like shorter.
[quote:f27a35a433="gabypj88"]those ogs that guy has are beat[/quote:f27a35a433]
I'm sorry what?
Those are in amazing condition considering their age. Are you kidding me?
anyone has comparison pics of bred I's? 94 and 01? I keep telling my friend that the 01 bred are little lower than the 94s. I could be wrong.
^Hit up dalyte1
I know he has pics to contribute and I believe the 94s are higher cut to the 01s
Here are some comparison pics for the Black/Red XIXs...The most notable differences I noticed are:
The suede on the OGs is much better
The patent leather is also better on the OGs
The retros are a little brighter shade of red both on the inside of the shoe and the sole (it's kind of hard to see it in my pics)
The toe box on the retros is a bit more narrow that the OGs...OGs much more comfortable in that aspect...
As far as the Zoom Air cushioning...both are the same (to me anyways)
I think that's it...on to the pics...Hope they help. The retros are on the left and the OGs on the right in all the pics.
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON8TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON7TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON6TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON5TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON4TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON3TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON2TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[img:6ac05746df]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON1TAG.jpg[/img:6ac05746df]
[quote:37b7e7130e="AC-130U"]Here are some comparison pics for the Black/Red XIXs...The most notable differences I noticed are:
The suede on the OGs is much better
The patent leather is also better on the OGs
The retros are a little brighter shade of red both on the inside of the shoe and the sole (it's kind of hard to see it in my pics)
The toe box on the retros is a bit more narrow that the OGs...OGs much more comfortable in that aspect...
As far as the Zoom Air cushioning...both are the same (to me anyways)
I think that's it...on to the pics...Hope they help. The retros are on the left and the OGs on the right in all the pics.
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON8TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON7TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON6TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON5TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON4TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON3TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON2TAG.jpg[/url]
[url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON1TAG.jpg[/url][/quote:37b7e7130e]
[b:37b7e7130e]Ugly az hell but nice comparisons :up: [/b:37b7e7130e]
Posted on page 1 :up:
Thank you.
looking at these 3's, the tongue+upper are different, as for the OBVIOUS jumpman/nike. The cement on the CDP look fatter than the ones on the 01's, and on the back on the cement part (last pic), they use double stitching for the CDP vs. one for the 01's. Other than that, they look spot on.
my final verdict: I have spent thousands of dollars on some of the nicest kicks, (calis, tiffs, tru blue 3's to name a few) the 01's are mighty fine and all, but looking on eBay for the 2001 3's cost $450-500 for a DS pair, let alone a VNDS pair. Nowadays, i dont want to spend that much in one shoe anymore. However, looking at these pics, CDP 3's are better alternatives than 01's. at $310 for both 3's and 20's these are a nice buy. Sure most ppl just bought other CDP for the 6's and 7's, and prolly these are no exception. After hearing that jordan will not retro any more jordans in 2009, these would be worth its weight in gold.
I'd really appreciate it if someone did the Playoff XII's. I think that'd be VERY helpful/useful. Thanks in advance.