Sole Collector | Sneakers, Air Jordan, Retro, Nike, Forum, Shoes, Kicks

jayfirered4

Much Respect

Joined:

Feb 2008

Posts:

1,180

Feedback:

Points:

11,276

Location:

New Jersey 07076

Months ago | 23rd July 2008 14:29

anyone got a comparison of 99 metallic 5s and the 2007 metallics?

+ T E A M -|- J E S U S +

AxGradeKid

In The Game

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

518

Feedback:

Points:

1,303

Location:

New York, NY

Months ago | 23rd July 2008 17:23

i really need these shoes
helpful thread

Milestailsprowe

BANNED

Joined:

Dec 2007

Posts:

1,335

Feedback:

-5

Points:

Months ago | 23rd July 2008 17:45

AC-130U:

Here are some comparison pics for the Black/Red XIXs...The most notable differences I noticed are:

The suede on the OGs is much better
The patent leather is also better on the OGs
The retros are a little brighter shade of red both on the inside of the shoe and the sole (it's kind of hard to see it in my pics)
The toe box on the retros is a bit more narrow that the OGs...OGs much more comfortable in that aspect...
As far as the Zoom Air cushioning...both are the same (to me anyways)

I think that's it...on to the pics...Hope they help. The retros are on the left and the OGs on the right in all the pics.

Click to show pictures

I love my ogs more for this. The techflex looks smaller and not even the same shape

vintagekickz

Frequent Visitor

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

250

Feedback:

Points:

Location:

tha yay!

Months ago | 23rd July 2008 20:35

this is very dope! i need og concords first i wasnt feelin dmps now im not feelin retros now i need OG CONCS!!!

hitlist 08:
retro blk cement III
retro blk infrared VI
og white infrared VI
og powder X
og concord XI
jordan x levis pack

415shoehead

Forum Ruler

Joined:

Oct 2005

Posts:

12,050

Feedback:

130

Points:

325

Location:

SF Chinatown, 415

Months ago | 23rd July 2008 20:51

AC-130U, Thanks for the pics. I guess i am goign to have to get a pair of the Originals. I heard from 2 people that the cushioning and toe box is better on the Originals.

S-S-S!!!!
Retro section, post 5 Giveaway/competition!!!(Free Prizes)
Goal For 2010 Size 10-11
{ }Clot AM1{ }HomeGrown AM1{ }StashAM95{ }Red Prem. High
{ }Lightning IV {x}Jordan Purple Metallic I
{ }Brazil Custom 3 Fabio Dunks

SOLExxSurvivor

Forum Master

Joined:

Feb 2008

Posts:

2,888

Feedback:

Points:

2,537

Location:

M I A M I .

Months ago | 26th July 2008 03:25

StAtE0fMYMiNd:

Nike Check > Jumpman Logo. & The Shape Of The Shoe For New Retros Seem So Sloppy. OGs Look Much Cleaner And Better Leather Quality.

cosign. OGs are way better. thatts why i love my collection

-Kevinn

JDM as FUCK

I stay fucked up .

"WHY ?"

Cause i prefer to live life the way it is .

vintagekickz

Frequent Visitor

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

250

Feedback:

Points:

Location:

tha yay!

Months ago | 26th July 2008 03:46

choose or lose im sick of my dmps thats why im coppin retros n ogs

hitlist 08:
retro blk cement III
retro blk infrared VI
og white infrared VI
og powder X
og concord XI
jordan x levis pack

tom is ill

Frequent Visitor

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

210

Feedback:

Points:

Months ago | 26th July 2008 20:55

CDP 3's look sooo shitty compared to the 2001's

DS GREEN BEANS FOR SALE

http://s528.photobucket.com/albums/dd323/tomisill/

tom is ill

Frequent Visitor

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

210

Feedback:

Points:

Months ago | 26th July 2008 21:33

tacticalshadow0:

I don't like how in the CDP Black cement they made the cement print part, "thinner?" It's like shorter.

[quote:9380361386="gabypj88"]those ogs that guy has are beat

I'm sorry what?

Those are in amazing condition considering their age. Are you kidding me?[/quote:9380361386]

i think he ment the ones that look like they were dipped in mud

DS GREEN BEANS FOR SALE

http://s528.photobucket.com/albums/dd323/tomisill/

tom is ill

Frequent Visitor

Joined:

Jun 2008

Posts:

210

Feedback:

Points:

Months ago | 27th July 2008 14:13

we should get a B-GRADE carmine 6 vs the CDP carmines i want a pair to rock and not worry bout creasing and dirty bottoms

DS GREEN BEANS FOR SALE

http://s528.photobucket.com/albums/dd323/tomisill/

anyone got a comparison of 99 metallic 5s and the 2007 metallics?

i really need these shoes helpful thread

[quote:100b325908="AC-130U"]Here are some comparison pics for the Black/Red XIXs...The most notable differences I noticed are: The suede on the OGs is much better The patent leather is also better on the OGs The retros are a little brighter shade of red both on the inside of the shoe and the sole (it's kind of hard to see it in my pics) The toe box on the retros is a bit more narrow that the OGs...OGs much more comfortable in that aspect... As far as the Zoom Air cushioning...both are the same (to me anyways) I think that's it...on to the pics...Hope they help. The retros are on the left and the OGs on the right in all the pics. [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON8TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON7TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON6TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON5TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON4TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON3TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON2TAG.jpg[/url] [url]http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k20/chornobyl_86/XIX_COMPARISON1TAG.jpg[/url][/quote:100b325908]I love my ogs more for this. The techflex looks smaller and not even the same shape

this is very dope! i need og concords first i wasnt feelin dmps now im not feelin retros now i need OG CONCS!!!

[b:c1d04962a5]AC-130U[/b:c1d04962a5], Thanks for the pics. I guess i am goign to have to get a pair of the Originals. I heard from 2 people that the cushioning and toe box is better on the Originals.

[quote:56f24828d5="StAtE0fMYMiNd"]Nike Check > Jumpman Logo. & The Shape Of The Shoe For New Retros Seem So Sloppy. OGs Look Much Cleaner And Better Leather Quality.[/quote:56f24828d5] cosign. OGs are way better. thatts why i love my collection

choose or lose im sick of my dmps thats why im coppin retros n ogs :up:

CDP 3's look sooo shitty compared to the 2001's

[quote:9380361386="tacticalshadow0"]I don't like how in the CDP Black cement they made the cement print part, "thinner?" It's like shorter. [quote:9380361386="gabypj88"]those ogs that guy has are beat[/quote:9380361386] I'm sorry what? Those are in amazing condition considering their age. Are you kidding me?[/quote:9380361386] i think he ment the ones that look like they were dipped in mud

we should get a B-GRADE carmine 6 vs the CDP carmines i want a pair to rock and not worry bout creasing and dirty bottoms

Jordan Comparisons - OG's vs Retros